MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312303401 · doi:10.1177/0008417415625421

The acquisition of parenting occupations in neonatal intensive care: A preliminary perspective

2016· article· en· W2312303401 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Deanna Gibbs, Kobie Boshoff, Mandy Stanley

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Occupational Therapy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Neonatal intensive care unitPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychological resilienceNarrativeIdentity (music)NursingMedicineSocial psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The birth of a preterm infant represents a major crisis for parents that may impact their performance of parenting occupations. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to explore the experiences that enable parents to participate in occupations associated with the role of parenting in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHOD: A paradigmatic analysis of narratives was completed based on interviews conducted with six parents of preterm infants. FINDINGS: Six themes were identified: anticipating occupations versus reality, needing emotional resilience, working to reclaim the parental role, navigating the NICU occupation-environment transactions, building and maintaining relationships with staff, and revisioning the future. IMPLICATIONS: The use of an occupation-based approach moves parents' involvement in the NICU beyond basic caregiving occupations. It highlights the importance of providing opportunities for nurturing and caring for their infants in ways that are meaningful to their identity as a parent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Occupational TherapySame topicInfant Development and Preterm CareFrench-language works237,207