MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312309600 · doi:10.3918/jsicm.21.137

Pregnancy-related critical illness in ICU

2014· article· en· W2312309600 on OpenAlexaff
Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Hiroko Aoyama, Masayuki Oshima

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCritical illnessPregnancyMedicineIntensive care medicineCritically illObstetricsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

妊産婦死亡が未だ少なからず存在する。1人の妊産婦死亡あたり,9人の重症妊産婦が発生している。しかし,通常ICUで妊産婦が占める割合は約1.5%と比較的稀である。稀な症例に対応するには,頻度の高い疾患(妊娠高血圧症候群,産科出血,産科関連敗血症)を把握しておく必要がある。一般的に,集中治療を要する重症妊産婦において,これら3疾患がICU入室理由の70%近くを占める。また,妊娠に伴う生理学的変化は,多臓器にわたって予備力を小さくし,非妊娠時に比べより重篤な状態に陥りやすくする。上記3疾患と生理学的変化の関連を理解することは,病態の把握に重要となる。そして,生理学的予備力の減少は胎児をも容易に危機的状況へと曝してしまう。集中治療医が重症妊産婦および胎児の予後改善に貢献するには,重症妊産婦の疫学と特有疾患を知り,妊娠に伴う多臓器の生理学的変化を把握し,胎児危機に陥る病態を早期に認識することである。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care MedicineSame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207