Effect of NaOH/urea solution on enhancing grease resistance and strength of paper
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new way as shown in the following scheme was developed to fabricate paper with high strength and grease resistance. Filter paper was impregnated in NaOH/urea aqueous solution pre-cooled to -12°C for 30 s and incubated at a fixed temperature for a period of time. Swelling and dissolution of cellulose fibers facilitated more compact structure of paper and higher strength. Various influencing factors were investigated in an attempt to improve grease resistance of the paper. The results demonstrated that the paper after treatment showed a 100% grease barrier property within 24 h, and a double increase in both tensile strength and tear strength compared with the untreated paper. Moreover, burst strength was enhanced more than three times and the stretch was improved simultaneously when the paper was performed with NaOH/urea (7%:12% weight ratio) at -12°C for 120 min. In addition, the wet tensile strength of the treated paper was close to the dry tensile strength of the untreated paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".