MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of NaOH/urea solution on enhancing grease resistance and strength of paper

2014· article· en· W2312444155 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltimate tensile strengthGreaseMaterials scienceUreaComposite materialTear resistanceAqueous solutionWet strengthDissolutionCelluloseSwellingChemical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new way as shown in the following scheme was developed to fabricate paper with high strength and grease resistance. Filter paper was impregnated in NaOH/urea aqueous solution pre-cooled to -12°C for 30 s and incubated at a fixed temperature for a period of time. Swelling and dissolution of cellulose fibers facilitated more compact structure of paper and higher strength. Various influencing factors were investigated in an attempt to improve grease resistance of the paper. The results demonstrated that the paper after treatment showed a 100% grease barrier property within 24 h, and a double increase in both tensile strength and tear strength compared with the untreated paper. Moreover, burst strength was enhanced more than three times and the stretch was improved simultaneously when the paper was performed with NaOH/urea (7%:12% weight ratio) at -12°C for 120 min. In addition, the wet tensile strength of the treated paper was close to the dry tensile strength of the untreated paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it