MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312485485 · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.013417

Photoelectron angular distributions of excited atoms in intense laser fields

2014· article· en· W2312485485 on OpenAlexaff
C. H. Raymond Ooi, WaiLoon Ho, André D. Bandrauk

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPhotoionizationAtomic physicsExcited stateAngular momentumIonizationTotal angular momentum quantum numberLinear polarizationAzimuthal quantum numberHydrogen-like atomAngular momentum couplingElectronQuantum numberLaserPolarization (electrochemistry)QuantumQuantum mechanicsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angular distributions of photoionization differential rates for an atom in arbitrary excited states ionized by intense laser fields with arbitrary polarization are reported. Relativistic effects are incorporated into the Keldysh theory, yielding semi-analytical expressions of ionization rates for hydrogenic initial states in intense linear, circular, and elliptical laser polarizations. Angular distributions are compared for different angular momentum quantum numbers, magnetic quantum numbers, and Keldysh parameters $\ensuremath{\gamma}$. The angular distributions are shown to depend strongly on $\ensuremath{\gamma}$, thus also reflecting the influence of relativistic effects. The sign of the magnetic quantum number, corresponding to different electron rotations, is shown to have a significant effect on photoelectron angular distributions in circularly polarized laser fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207