Modeling the Interactions of the Nucleotide Excision Repair UvrA<sub>2</sub> Dimer with DNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The UvrA protein initiates the DNA damage recognition process by the bacterial nucleotide excision repair (NER) system. Recently, crystallographic structures of holo-UvrA(2) dimers from two different microorganisms have been released (Protein Data Bank entries 2r6f , 2vf7 , and 2vf8 ). However, the details of the DNA binding by UvrA(2) and other peculiarities involved in the damage recognition process remain unknown. We have undertaken a molecular modeling approach to appraise the possible modes of DNA-UvrA(2) interaction using molecular docking and short-scale guided molecular dynamics [continuum field, constrained, and/or unrestricted simulated annealing (SA)], taking into account the three-dimensional location of a series of mutation-identified UvrA residues implicated in DNA binding. The molecular docking was based on the assumptions that the UvrA(2) dimer is preformed prior to DNA binding and that no major protein conformational rearrangements, except moderate domain reorientations, are required for binding of undamaged DNA. As a first approximation, DNA was treated as a rigid ligand. From the electrostatic relief of the ventral surface of UvrA(2), we initially identified three, noncollinear DNA binding paths. Each of the three resulting nucleoprotein complexes (C1, C2, and C3) was analyzed separately, including calculation of binding energies, the number and type of interaction residues (including mutated ones), and the predominant mode of translational and rotational motion of specific protein domains after SA to ensure improved DNA binding. The UvrA(2) dimer can accommodate DNA in all three orientations, albeit with different binding strengths. One of the UvrA(2)-DNA complexes (C1) fulfilled most of the requirements (high interaction energy, proximity of DNA to mutated residues, etc.) expected for a natural, high-affinity DNA binding site. This nucleoprotein presents a structural organization that is designed to clamp and bend double-stranded DNA. We examined the binding site in more detail by docking DNAs of significantly different (AT- vs CG-enriched) sequences and by submitting the complexes to DNA-unrestricted SA. It was found that in a manner independent of the DNA sequence and applied MD protocols, UvrA(2) favors binding of a bent and unwound undamaged DNA, with a kink positioned in the proximity of the Zn3 hairpins, anticollinearly aligned at the bottom of the ventral protein surface. It is further hypothesized that the Zn3 modules play an essential role in the damage recognition process and that the apparent existence of a family of DNA binding sites might be biologically relevant. Our data should prove to be useful in rational (structure-based) mutation studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".