<i>Cyathochitina cycnea</i> (Chitinozoa), a new name for <i>Cyathochitina giraffa</i> Hennissen <i>et al</i>., 2010
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NomeNclatural NoteHennissen et al. (2010) described a chitinozoan fauna from the Dawangou section in the Xinjiang region of China, an auxiliary Global Stratoype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Upper Ordovician Series.The fauna contained one new species, which they named Cyathochitina giraffa.Their paper was published in December 2010 (formally accepted 10 July 2010).However, Grahn & Nõlvak (2010) had already published a paper in June of the same year, including a different new species that was also named Cyathochitina giraffa.According to the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999, Art.52.3.), the species Cyathochitina giraffa Grahn & Nõlvak, 2010 is the senior homonym and, therefore, has nomenclatural priority.The species described by Hennissen et al. (2010) needs to be renamed.Here, we introduce a new name for this species: Cyathochitina cycnea nom.nov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".