MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312572783 · doi:10.1137/10s010818

Macroscopic Cross-Diffusion Models Derived from Spatially Discrete Continuous Time Microscopic Models

2011· article· en· W2312572783 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen Ostrander

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Undergraduate Research Online · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsDiffusionStatistical physicsDiscrete modellingMechanicsPhysicsComputer scienceThermodynamicsAlgorithmDiscrete system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We formulate a continuous time, discrete in space model for two spatially interacting species. The spatial interaction is described in terms of a measure for the desire or ability of a population to move from one location into a neighboring site. This can depend on local densities of both populations in the current and the target site. Refining the spatial resolution and passing to a continuous in space model, one obtains a system of partial differential equations with cross diffusion terms. We show that certain cross-diffusion models that have been used in the literature to describe interacting species can be derived as special cases with our approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Undergraduate Research OnlineSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207