L’Exposition de Montréal 1967 : empreinte et matrice d’une francophonie émergente
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des travaux récents ont démontré la fonction identitaire reliée à l’Exposition universelle de Montréal : dans sa programmation comme dans son déroulement et sa réception, celle-ci a contribué à l’affirmation de l’identité québécoise moderne. Sensibles au niveau de la province et du pays organisateurs, ces enjeux identitaires d’Expo 67 ont-ils été plus largement posés par rapport à la francophonie en émergence, tant au niveau institutionnel que culturel ? Sur la base des dossiers d’archives de l’Exposition de Montréal, cette contribution applique au cas de l’Expo 67 les fonctions importantes des expositions universelles sériées par l’historiographie. On perçoit ainsi en quoi l’événement de Montréal constitue un miroir, une empreinte de cette géopolitique francophone en émergence, et dans quelle mesure cette Exposition a renforcé la constitution d’un espace politico- culturel francophone au tournant des années 1960-1970.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".