Perioperative Complications After Surgical Correction in Neuromuscular Scoliosis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the perioperative complications associated with surgical correction in neuromuscular scoliosis and to identify the risk factors associated with these complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of the hospital charts of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent surgical correction at a medical center was performed. RESULTS: Data was available on a total of 175 patients. The overall perioperative complication rate was 33.1% (96 complications in 58 patients). Complications were subdivided into pulmonary issues (19.4%), wound and implant infections (9.7%), cardiovascular complications (4.0%), intraoperative neurological changes (4.6%), miscellaneous complications (5.7%), and problematic instrumentation (3.4%). No patient had an identifiable permanent postoperative change in neurological status. The complication rate in patients who underwent single-stage procedures (37.4%) was found lower than that in patients who underwent staged procedures (57.1%). There were no deaths during the perioperative period. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neuromuscular scoliosis are at high risk of developing perioperative complications after surgical correction of their deformity (overall rate, 33.1%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it