Linkage between static and cyclic liquefaction of loose sand with a range of fines contents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The underlying mechanism of static and cyclic liquefaction of loose contractant sandy soil is unstable behaviour associated with deviatoric strain-softening. Such unstable (strain-softening) behaviour has been referred to as static or cyclic instability depending on whether the loading condition is monotonic or cyclic. Past research into linkage between static instability and cyclic instability of sand with fines is based largely on comparing monotonic and one-way cyclic loading behaviour of specimens of the same void ratio and fines content. In this article, the authors attempt to link the condition that defines triggering of cyclic instability to that of static instability of specimens of different void ratios and fines contents. This is achieved by the proposed concept of equivalent granular state parameter. Two specimens are considered as equivalent if they have the same equivalent granular state parameters at the start of undrained shearing. The effective stress ratio at triggering of static instability can be used to predict impending cyclic instability of an equivalent specimen of different fines content and void ratio. This linkage between static and cyclic instability was evaluated for a wide range of fines contents, initial mean effective stresses, and types of cyclic loading. The last factor includes symmetrical and nonsymmetrical two-way cyclic loading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".