MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312664921 · doi:10.1093/asj/sjw033

EBM Hub Challenge

2016· letter· en· W2312664921 on OpenAlexaff
Felmont F. Eaves, Achilleas Thoma

Bibliographic record

VenueAesthetic Surgery Journal · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Implant and Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCapsular contractureIncidence (geometry)Breast augmentationContractureSurgeryAugmentation MammoplastyGeneral surgeryInternal medicineBreast cancerImplantBreast reconstruction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this edition of the EBM Hub, we'll be discussing the current article by Flugstad et al1 concerning the use of funnel insertion devices in reducing the incidence of capsular contracture in primary breast augmentation. As we've now had several examples of Hub analyses, we'd like to challenge you to make your own assessment and then watch our video and see how your assessment compares to ours. The authors examined the incidence of capsular contracture in two groups of patients undergoing augmentation …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAesthetic Surgery JournalSame topicBreast Implant and ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207