MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Orexin Neurons Respond Differentially to Auditory Cues Associated with Appetitive versus Aversive Outcomes

2016· article· en· W2312683292 on OpenAlexafffund
Oum Kaltoum Hassani, Matthew R. Krause, Lynda Mainville, Christopher Andy Córdova, Barbara E. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistère du Développement Économique, de l’Innovation et de l’ExportationNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNeuroscienceOrexinArousalPsychologyLickingLateral hypothalamusMuscle toneTone (literature)HypothalamusMedicineInternal medicineNeuropeptide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orexin (Orx) neurons are known to be involved in the promotion and maintenance of waking because they discharge in association with cortical activation and muscle tone during waking and because, in their absence, waking with muscle tone cannot be maintained and narcolepsy with cataplexy ensues. Whether Orx neurons discharge during waking in association with particular conditions, notably with appetitive versus aversive stimuli or positive versus negative emotions, is debated and considered important in understanding their role in supporting particular waking behaviors. Here, we used the technique of juxtacellular recording and labeling in head-fixed rats to characterize the discharge of Orx neurons during the performance of an associative discrimination task with auditory cues for appetitive versus aversive outcomes. Of 57 active, recorded, and neurobiotin-labeled neurons in the lateral hypothalamus, 11 were immunohistochemically identified as Orx-positive (Orx(+)), whereas none were identified as melanin-concentrating hormone-positive. Orx(+) neurons discharged at significantly higher rates during the tone associated with sucrose than during the tone associated with quinine delivered upon licking. They also discharged at high rates after the tone associated with sucrose. Across periods and outcomes, their discharge was positively correlated with EEG gamma activity and EMG activity, which is indicative of cortical activation and behavioral arousal. These results suggest that Orx neurons discharge in a manner characteristic of reward neurons yet also characteristic of arousal neurons. Accordingly, the Orx neurons may respond to and participate in reward processes while modulating cortical activity and muscle tone to promote and maintain arousal along with learned adaptive behavioral responses. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Orexin neurons play a critical role in promoting and maintaining a waking state because, in their absence, narcolepsy with cataplexy ensues. Known to discharge during waking and not during sleep, they have also been proposed to be selectively active during appetitive behaviors. Here, we recorded and labeled neurons in rats to determine the discharge of immunohistochemically identified orexin neurons during performance of an associative discrimination task. Orexin neurons responded differentially to auditory cues associated with appetitive sucrose versus aversive quinine, indicating that they behave like reward neurons. However, correlated discharge with cortical and muscle activity indicates that they also behave like arousal neurons and can thus promote cortical activation with behavioral arousal and muscle tone during adaptive waking behaviors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207