MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312725312 · doi:10.1149/1.3570157

Reverse Cell Bias for the Prevention of Ni Oxidation during Air Exposure

2011· article· en· W2312725312 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason L. Young, Vedasri Vedharathinam, Viola Birss

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOverpotentialCathodic protectionAnodeBiasingElectrolytePolarization (electrochemistry)Materials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Current densityRedoxVoltageChemistryElectrodeMetallurgyEnvironmental chemistryElectrical engineeringElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary aim of this work was to prevent Ni oxidation by reverse biasing of the cell during air exposure at SOFC operating temperatures. As the area specific polarization resistance (Rp, inversely proportional to the H2 oxidation activity) of electrolyte-supported Ni-YSZ anodes normally decreases after a single redox cycle, the approach used here was to determine if reverse polarization during air exposure can prevent this performance enhancement. The use of a constant cathodic potential did not appear to prevent Ni oxidation, although it is likely that an insufficiently negative potential was applied. However, anode performance enhancement was prevented by the application of a constant applied current density during air exposure. However, these results are not fully conclusive, as the extent of Ni oxidation could not be determined analytically in situ. Notably, observations, such as an increase in the observed cathodic overpotential during negative biasing and the decrease in Rp after air exposure (with applied cathodic currents) still need to be understood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207