MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312802242 · doi:10.1021/ef300354j

Production Characteristics of the Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) and Solvent-Aided SAGD (SA-SAGD) Processes Using a 2-D Macroscale Physical Model

2012· article· en· W2312802242 on OpenAlexaffabout
Omid Mohammadzadeh, Nima Rezaei, Ioannis Chatzis

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteam-assisted gravity drainagePetroleum engineeringAsphaltPorous mediumOil sandsOil in placePorosityPermeability (electromagnetism)Environmental scienceProcess engineeringGeologyMaterials sciencePetroleumEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are extensive bitumen deposits in Canada that, with the development of sustainable exploitation technologies, can satisfy the energy requirements of the nation for more than a century. The currently available surface mining and in situ recovery techniques are applicable to only ∼15% of the known in-place resources. There is an obvious need for improved technology to make more of the in-place resources exploitable. This paper is aimed at studying the macroscale performance of the steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and the solvent-aided SAGD (SA-SAGD) processes. A two-dimensional (2-D) physical model of porous media was designed and fabricated for the purpose of implementing these two processes. The physical model was packed with different sizes of glass beads to create porous media with different permeability values. Athabasca bitumen was used as the oil phase. All the SAGD and SA-SAGD experiments were performed in an isothermal jacket as the controlled-temperature environment to reduce the amount of undesired heat loss from the model to the surrounding environment. In addition, layers of insulating materials attached to wooden frames were used to cover the back and side faces of the packed model to further reduce the heat losses. All the experiments were conducted under the free uptake flow circulation methodology at atmospheric pressure. For the SAGD experiments, replicate trials were also designed and conducted in order to ensure the repeatability of the experiments. According to the SAGD experimental results, the average mobile oil production rate, as well as that of the dead oil, is constant over the course of the process. When all other experimental variables are unchanged except the porous medium permeability, the higher the permeability of the porous medium, the higher the amount of water content of the produced mobile oil, but the lower the steam-to-oil ratio. The residual oil saturation in the invaded region of the porous medium was obtained to be ∼3%–4.6% of the total pore volume at higher and lower permeability levels, respectively. Moreover, the microstructure of the dispersed water condensate droplets in the continuum of the produced mobile oil was studied with the aid of an advanced photomicrography system integrated with image processing unit. It was determined that water condensate droplets with equivalent sizes as small as 5 μm were dispersed in the mobile oil background. Average droplet size values were measured for both of the permeability levels used in the SAGD experiments, based on the image processing of the microscopic snapshots taken from the produced emulsion samples. One SA-SAGD trial was also conducted in order to demonstrate the enhancement made in the production performance of the SAGD process, following the coinjection of solvent with steam. It was determined that the average mobile oil and dead oil production rates of the SA-SAGD process are reasonably constant over the course of the experiment. In the SA-SAGD process, there were enhancements of ∼18% and 20% in the mobile oil and dead oil production rates, respectively, compared to the corresponding average values in the SAGD experiments at similar permeability values. The average water production rate and the SOR values of the SA-SAGD experiment were ∼9% and ∼35% less than those of the corresponding SAGD trials, respectively. The microscopic snapshots of the produced water in oil emulsion were also studied for the case of the SA-SAGD experiment and it was obtained that water condensate droplets with an equivalent size of as small as 5 μm were dispersed in the continuum of the produced mobile oil. In addition, an average water droplet size range was determined based on the measurements using image processing techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207