MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312803852 · doi:10.2118/177480-ms

Sensitivity Analysis of Unstructured Meshing Parameters on Production Forecast of Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells

2015· article· en· W2312803852 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGridPolygon meshGeologyUnstructured gridSensitivity (control systems)WorkflowContext (archaeology)Mesh generationComputer scienceEngineeringFinite element methodStructural engineeringElectronic engineeringComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the context of multi-stage hydraulically fractured horizontal wells, unstructured grids such as PEBI (perpendicular bisector) grids or Voronoi grids have been widely applied to generate simulation meshes for fracture networks. In previous work we developed a robust optimization-based 2D meshing algorithms to handle non-orthogonal, low-angle intersections of extensively-clustered fractures with non-uniform aperture distributions. However, vertically extruded 2.5D PEBI grids become necessary with more wells being drilled into dipping layers. Besides, it is necessary to provide practical application suggestions for choosing an unstructured mesh to accurately resolve flow regimes of production. In this work we extended 2D PEBI workflow to 2.5D, and then validated it against two models: (a) a synthetic model with one horizontal well and 120 orthogonal intersected hydraulic fractures built by Tar-tan grid and (b) a field-scale model with three horizontal wells and 120 non-orthogonal intersected hydraulic fractures in a slightly dipping reservoir created by a commercial software plug-in. For the synthetic model, we simulated production performance at a constant bottom-hole flowing pressure up to 20 years. For the field-scale model, we first performed history matching and then predicted production at a constant rate up to 20 years. We compared pressure diffusion front, bottom-hole flowing pressure as well as CPU performance. Reasonably good matches between PEBI grids and other grids are observed in both pressure diffusion front and production behavior. Sensitivity analysis suggests that refinement around the fractures has modest impact to early time production while background density has dominant impact to the late time production. Background grid type and grid orientation have less influence as long as they have the same grid density. Less number of 2.5D PEBI cells can be achieved by removing unnecessary refinement around fractures, increasing reservoir background size and reservoir background size ratio, replacing unstructured background grids with structured grids, and reducing the complexity of the fracture networks without loss of the accuracy and therefore result in much favorable CPU performance. The existence of opened natural fractures was evaluated to simulate the out-of-zone production. The results suggest that effective drainage area can be significantly greater with the synergy of the natural fractures. This study is the first to apply unstructured grids to simulate multiple horizontal wells with irregular hydraulic fractures. Besides, this paper provides detailed discussions of implementation algorithms as well as comparisons between 2.5D PEBI and LGR based grids in the context of fracture modeling. And most importantly, this study answers the question regarding how to choose an appropriate 2.5D PEBI mesh to yield both accurate results and good CPU performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it