MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312848984 · doi:10.3354/cr01157

Projection of multi-site daily temperatures over the Montréal area, Canada

2013· article· en· W2312848984 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueClimate Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDownscalingMultivariate statisticsGeographyProjection (relational algebra)Environmental scienceMeteorologyOperations researchClimatologyLibrary scienceStatisticsComputer scienceMathematicsGeologyAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a post-adjustment procedure for a multivariate multi-site statistical downscaling model (MMSDM) which can simultaneously downscale multiple predictands at multiple observation sites by combining multivariate multiple linear regression and the stochastic randomization procedure. In the post-adjustment procedure, bias and determinant adjustment factors correct the systematic bias on the downscaled series using atmosphere-ocean coupled global climate model (AOGCM) predictors, and prevent the propagation of systematic error to the projected future predictands. The MMSDM with the post-adjustment procedure is applied to project a realistic series of 2 predictands (daily T max and T min ) for 10 observation sites in the region of Montral (southern Qubec, Canada). The Canadian CGCM3 reference outputs and future outputs under the A1B and A2 SRES scenarios (2061-2100) were employed as AOGCM predictors. On average over the 10 observation sites, the monthly means of the daily T max and T min were increased by 2.0-4.7 and 2.7-5.4C while seasonal 90th percentile of daily T max and 10th percentile of daily T min (T max 90 and T min 10) were increased by 2.1-4.5 and 2.7-5.8C for the A1B and A2 scenarios with the MMSDM, respectively. Future T max and T min series showed higher increases in winter than in the other seasons, as anticipated from AOGCMs or regional climate models over the same area. The average diurnal temperature ranges of future series suggest small increases in spring and autumn. Finally, the projected series yielded frost seasons that are 23 and 28 d shorter, whereas 23 and 27 more days are projected for the length of the growing season than in the present-day climate series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it