MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312858575 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000000186

Association Between Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy

2014· article· en· W2312858575 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Canadian institutionsProvincial Health Services AuthorityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnterior ischemic optic neuropathyConfidence intervalInternal medicineOptic neuropathyMedical prescriptionRate ratioDiabetes mellitusSurgeryOphthalmologyOptic nervePharmacologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Use of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors has been reported to be a risk factor for development of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) in males, based largely on a number of case reports. The objective of our study was to determine whether men who use this class of medications are more likely than a matched control group to develop NAION. METHODS: A pharmacoepidemiological nested case-control study was used to examine the above association in a health claims database of physician diagnoses and prescription medication dispensing. Cases of NAION were matched with corresponding controls and correlated with the use of PDE-5 inhibitors. A conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate rate ratios for development of NAION with use of PDE-5 inhibitors. RESULTS: A total of 1,109 cases of NAION were found and matched to 1,237,290 controls identified within the database. Cases were more likely to have hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accident in the year preceding their NAION. The adjusted rate ratio for any use of PDE-5 inhibitor in the year before the NAION was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.28); recent use of a PDE-5 inhibitor in the 30 days before the NAION also had no significant association, with an adjusted rate ratio of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.75-1.23). Results for individual PDE-5 inhibitors did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not suggest any association between having a prescription filled for PDE-5 inhibitor medication and receiving a diagnosis code for NAION. This is consistent with other studies in the literature that have failed to elucidate a plausible mechanism by which these drugs might compromise circulation at the optic nerve head.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it