Hetero-multinuclear Ruthenium(III)/Platinum(II) Complexes That Potentially Exhibit Both Antimetastatic and Antineoplastic Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hetero-multinuclear, platinum/ruthenium species were synthesized and tested for their effect on the motility of A549 (nonsmall cell lung) and MDA-MB-231 (breast) cancer cells and for their ability to inhibit DNA mobility using gel electrophoresis. It was found that the Ru(2)Pt trinuclear species [Na(2)]{[Ru(III)Cl(4)(DMSO-S)(-μ-pyz)](2)Pt(II)Cl(2)}, AH197, was much more efficient at inhibiting cell motility than [C(3)N(2)H(5)][Ru(III)Cl(4)(DMSO-S)(C(3)N(2)H(4))], NAMI-A, while the dinuclear RuPt species [K][Ru(III)Cl(4)(DMSO-S)(-μ-pyz)Pt(II)(DMSO-S)Cl(2)], IT127, was slightly better than NAMI-A. However, the dinuclear species retarded the electrophoretic mobility of DNA greater than both the trinuclear complex and cisplatin. The metal complexes and their respective BSA protein/metal adducts were studied by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The spectra led to the conclusion that BSA donor atoms have substituted for the chloride ligands and perhaps the DMSO ligands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".