MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2312930893 · doi:10.1177/1715163515569218

Evidence for the role and impact of pharmacists

2015· article· en· W2312930893 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Aurélie Guérin, Denis Lebel, Jean‐François Bussières

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As financial resources become more limited and drug expenses increase, the pharmacist has become a key health care professional in ensuring optimal drug use. In response to this, pharmacists’ scope of practice is expanding, and they must use the best available evidence to support current pharmacy practice models and those about to be implemented. Although pharmacists are being taught about evidence-based pharmacotherapy, we believe there is insufficient exposure to evidence-based practice models in the pharmacy curriculum and daily practice. In this paper, we describe our new website, which focuses on Canadian pharmacy practice research and the role and impact of pharmacists in health care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.284
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.284
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.321
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.117 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada→Same topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→French-language works237,207→