MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312931383 · doi:10.3749/canmin.50.2.397

STRUCTURES AND CLASSIFICATION OF INDIUM SULFOSALTS, AND THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF Sn12In19(Se,S)41

2012· article· en· W2312931383 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Dan Topa, E. Makovicky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsOctahedronCrystallographyMonoclinic crystal systemIndiumGroup (periodic table)TinCrystal structureChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new synthetic phase, ~Sn12In19(Se,S)41, synthesized in the condensed system Fe–Sn–Sb–In–S–Se at 600°C, is monoclinic with a 56.29(4), b 3.924(3), c 15.916(10) A, β 102.56(1)°, space group C 2 /m , and Z = 2. It occurs as needle-like crystals together with chemically analyzed Fe9S10, FeIn2(S,Se)4, ~SbSn9(Se,S)10 and ~Sn4Sb3In2(S,Se)11. The crystal structure has been refined to a conventional R factor R 1 of 6.29% for 2339 unique reflections with F o > 4σ (F o ) . There are 16 unique sites of Sn and In and 21 unique sites of (Se,S) in the asymmetric unit. It is a composite-layer structure with two kinds of layers in regular alternation; together, they undergo a step-like modulation. The pseudotetragonal layers are three atomic planes thick and modified by steps into oval-shaped fragments containing octahedra of indium and trigonal coordination prisms of tin. Single-octahedron pseudohexagonal layers are of two regularly alternating kinds: those with an overlap of two octahedra in the step region and those with a gap of one octahedron in those regions. The title compound, ~Sn12In19(Se,S)41, is a member of a M15+NS20+N series of closely related composite-layer structures with alternating, periodically sheared pseudohexagonal and pseudotetragonal layers (a “sliding series” according to its main structural principle of slabs with fixed step-like configurations sliding past one another and thus creating chemical and structural differences on the planes of their contact). A parallel series with less frequently sheared layers is known only from the Pb6In13.34S26 – Sn5In14S26 pair. Two cannizzarite-related structures with layers unsheared, one potential cylindrite-type structure, two families of rod-based structures, one known complex sulfide with In–In bonds, and the structure of PbIn2S4 are further principal structure-types of complex indium sulfides in addition to members of the pavonite homologous series and several individual sulfosalt structures that are in need of revision. Alternation of pseudotetragonal and pseudohexagonal layers and formation of rod-based structures are the two basic principles in the construction of complex sulfides and selenides of indium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207