MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ferruginous Foreign Body

2002· article· en· W2312979557 on OpenAlex
Suzanne M. Paproski, Sally Smith, Richard I. Crawford

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Dermatopathology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign bodyLesionForeign-body giant cellAnatomyMedicinePathologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 53-year-old man reported a pigmented lesion on his forearm that he had first become aware of approximately 30 years previously. More recently, the lesion had become symptomatic and was excised because of concern of melanoma; however, during tissue processing, an embedded metallic object was found. Histologic examination of the tissue surrounding the site of the metallic object confirmed an inner zone of iron deposition with a distinctive histologic appearance indistinguishable from rust, associated with a foreign body reaction. Surrounding this was an outer zone of siderophages with the more usual histologic appearance. Chemical analysis of the foreign body confirmed its ferruginous nature. On subsequent questioning, the patient informed us that he had worked with heavy equipment in a mine at the time that he had first noticed the lesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it