MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313124004 · doi:10.1142/s0218127416500462

Chaos and Synchronization in Complex Fractional-Order Chua’s System

2016· article· en· W2313124004 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLyapunov exponentSynchronization (alternating current)Chua's circuitCHAOS (operating system)Control theory (sociology)MathematicsChaoticSynchronization of chaosBifurcationOrder (exchange)Secure communicationComputer scienceNonlinear systemTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsEncryptionControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, chaos in complex-order Chua’s system and its chaotic synchronization for secure communication are studied based on the fractional derivative investigated. Chaos in complex-order Chua’s system is illustrated by presenting its waveform graphs, states diagrams and bifurcation graphs. The dynamic behaviors in the complex-order Chua’s system and time-delayed Chua’s system are compared. In addition, the largest Lyapunov exponents of normal and time-delayed Chua’s systems are calculated and verified by numerical simulations. The experiment indicates that the chaos in such Chua’s system can achieve two channel communications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it