Adsorption of Indole on Kaolinite in Nonaqueous Media: Organoclay Preparation and Characterization, and 3D-RISM-KH Molecular Theory of Solvation Investigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current oil sand mining operations in the Athabasca basin are predominantly aqueous-based. Extracts containing large amounts of fines lead to the formation of stable organoclay suspensions in froths giving lower yields and greater tailing wastes and making the development of more efficient extraction methods desirable from both economical and environmental perspectives. We examine an indole-kaolinite system as a model for these oil fines and their resistance to washing in nonaqueous solvents. The prepared organoclays show indole loading exclusively on the external surface of the clay. Micron-scaled vermicular structures, similar to natural kaolinite, are observed. Their formation is believed to be driven by strong adsorbate–adsorbate interactions. Indole is the primary adsorbate, as solvent adsorption is shown to be minimal based on both experimental and computational results. Isotherms are constructed and parameters calculated from linear regression analysis fitted to the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller equation. Monolayer quantities calculated match well to the theoretical amount calculated from surface areas measurements. Washing the organoclays with both toluene and isopropanol results in a 50% decrease of loaded organic material, leaving a monolayer equivalent of organic matter. The statistical-mechanical 3D-RISM-KH molecular theory of solvation is employed to perform full sampling of solvent orientations around a kaolinite platelet and gain insights into the preferred orientation and adsorption thermodynamics of indole on kaolinite in toluene and heptane solvents. In its preferred orientation, indole is hydrogen-bonded to one or two O atoms at the aluminum hydroxide surface of kaolinite. The calculated solvation free energy and potential of mean force for adsorption of indole and solvents on kaolinite in solution yield the increasing adsorption strength order of heptane < toluene < indole on the aluminum hydroxide surface. Multilayer adsorption profiles are predicted based on the integrated three-dimensional distribution functions of indole, toluene, and heptane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".