MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313163324 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-2484

Abstract 2484: Whole-exome sequencing of a rare case of familial childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2012· article· en· W2313163324 on OpenAlexaff
Jasmine Healy, Virginie Saillour, Jean-François Spinella, Ramón Vidal, Eric Bareke, Chantal Richer, Mathieu Larivière, Stephan Busche, Bing Ge, Alexandre Montpetit, Tomi Pastinen, Daniel Sinnett

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University and Génome Québec Innovation CentreUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiblingExome sequencingGeneticsGermlineExomeGeneBiologyAlleleCancerChildhood leukemiaLymphoblastic LeukemiaLeukemiaMedicineMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer in children, accounting for approximately 25% of all pediatric cancer cases. However, familial childhood ALL is extremely rare. Few families with multiple non-twinned siblings diagnosed with childhood ALL have been reported, and to date no highly penetrant leukemia susceptibility gene(s) has been identified to explain this uncommon occurrence. We postulated that pure (nonsyndromic) familial childhood ALL could result from the accumulation of disadvantaging rare DNA variants in predisposing genes or biological pathways. To address this hypothesis, we used next-generation sequencing technologies to capture and re-sequence the whole-exomes of a family comprising the mother, father and two male non-twinned affected siblings (sibling A and sibling B). Both brothers were diagnosed with the identical ALL subtype, pre-B hyperdiploid childhood ALL, three years apart. The similar clinical and molecular characteristics of the siblings suggest shared etiologic factors. Using the Agilent SureSelect All Human Exon 38 Mb Kit and the SOLiD 3 Plus system, we captured and sequenced a total of 17.5 Gb of sequence for the entire family, with a mean coverage of 47X. For each individual, approximately 96% or 36.4 Mb of the targeted bases were covered α1X and 70% of the targeted bases or 26.4 Mb passed our thresholds for variant calling. We identified 52,038 positions at which the called allele(s) differed from the reference genome in at least one of the four family members. In total, we identified 19,096 germline variants in sibling A and 28,061 in sibling B, of which 2,355 (12.3%) and 2,125 (7.6%), respectively, were previously undiscovered in dbSNP. We investigated non-synonymous homozygous variant and compound heterozygous positions shared between the siblings, as well as genes/pathways with increased burden of rare non-synonymous variants. Based on several criteria (PolyPhen annotation, known allele frequency, etc.), we identified variants that are strong functional candidates to explain this case of pure familial childhood ALL. In parallel, high-density genotyping was also performed (Illumina Omni 2.5M) for quality control and structural variant detection, allowing the identification of putatively shared copy number variants that may also be involved in leukemogenesis. Though independent validation and functional assessment is required, this is the first study to identify genetic factors involved in pure familial childhood ALL. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2484. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2484

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207