MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313288027 · doi:10.1021/am502405n

Structure-Modified Stress Dynamics and Wetting Characteristics of Carbon Nanotubes and Multilayer Graphene for Electron Field Emission Investigations

2014· article· en· W2313288027 on OpenAlexaff
Himani Sharma, D.C. Agarwal, Mohit Sharma, A. K. Shukla, D. K. Avasthi, V. D. Vankar

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDepartment of Electronics and Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology
KeywordsMaterials scienceHigh-resolution transmission electron microscopyGrapheneField electron emissionCarbon nanotubeRaman spectroscopyWettingNanotechnologyFluenceTransmission electron microscopyChemical physicsElectronIrradiationComposite materialOpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present work, feasibility of achieving enhanced electron field-emission properties of stress-induced carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and multilayer graphene (MLGs) by ion modification is studied. Micro-Raman spectroscopy is used as a potent technique for in-depth investigations of stress-induced CNTs and MLGs. It is found that iron used as a catalyst, compresses at particular fluence and induces stresses in CNTs and MLGs to modify these structures, supported by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) studies. The stresses are explained by the buckling wavelength (λ ∝ e((r/t)0.5)). Furthermore, the stresses induced in exotic nanostructures are studied for investigating wetting properties, which are well-corroborated with electron emission characteristics. It is found out that less-wetted CNTs and MLGs display enhanced emission properties with turn-on voltages (Eon) of 1.5 and 2.1 V/μm, respectively, in comparison to hydrophilic CNTs and MLGs with Eon of 2.6 and 4 V/μm, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207