MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313298613 · doi:10.5740/jaoacint.12-066

Rapid Determination of Chloramphenicol in Honey by Laser Diode Thermal Desorption Using Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2013· article· en· W2313298613 on OpenAlexaff
Grégory Blachon, Pierre Picard, Patrice Tremblay, S. Demers, Réal Paquin, Yves Babin, Paul B. Fayad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of AOAC International · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalPhytronix (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmospheric-pressure chemical ionizationChromatographyChemistryMass spectrometryExtraction (chemistry)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Thermal desorptionTandem mass spectrometryDetection limitChemical ionizationIonizationDesorptionAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A high-throughput, rapid, and reliable method based on laser diode thermal desorption (LDTD) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization coupled to tandem MS (APCI-MS/MS) was used to identify and quantify chloramphenicol (CAP) residues in honey. Sample pretreatment consisted of a liquid–liquid extraction of diluted honey in water with ethyl acetate containing stearic acid. After extraction, a 2 μL aliquot of the organic phase was deposited into a 96-well plate prior to detection by LDTD-APCI-MS/MS. The total analysis time was less than 6 s compared to several minutes for traditional chromatographic methods used for CAP detection, since no chromatographic separation was necessary. The extraction and analysis were made with honey samples of different color grading ranging from extra white to dark amber. The method showed good linearity (R2 = 0.99995) within a concentration range of 0.1 to 500 ng/g for CAP with D5-CAP as an internal standard. The RSD varied between 8 and 24% over the calibration range (n = 4). The method LOD for CAP in honey was 0.19 ng/g. This work demonstrates that LDTD-APCI-MS/MS could be used for fast and effective quantification of CAP in honey samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AOAC InternationalSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207