MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313343685 · doi:10.1021/jp301231p

Structural and Band Gap Investigation of GaN:ZnO Heterojunction Solid Solution Photocatalyst Probed by Soft X-ray Spectroscopy

2012· article· en· W2313343685 on OpenAlexaff
Eamon McDermott, E.Z. Kurmaev, Teak D. Boyko, L. D. Finkelstein, R. J. Green, Kazuhiko Maeda, Kazunari Domen, A. Moewes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBand gapHeterojunctionMaterials scienceX-ray absorption spectroscopyAbsorption spectroscopySpectroscopySemimetalEmission spectrumSpectral lineWide-bandgap semiconductorSolid solutionValence (chemistry)Electronic structureOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryOpticsComputational chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the electronic structure of (Ga 1– x Zn x )(N 1– x O x ) as a function of zinc and oxygen concentration ( x ) using soft X-ray emission (XES) and absorption (XAS) spectroscopy. We have constructed a binding energy model of the compound’s valence band using common metal features found in both N K and O K XES spectra. By comparing the spectra with theoretical DFT models, we determine that our measurements describe an inverted gap heterostructure of GaN and ZnO with two optical gaps characteristic of each phase, 2.6 and 2.8 eV, respectively. We observe a band gap reduction of 0.4 eV across the range of x tested, which is attributed to repulsion between each phase’s conduction band onset due to the proximity of states at the phase interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207