MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313438481 · doi:10.2741/200

Thymus-bound: the many features of T cell progenitors

2011· review· en· W2313438481 on OpenAlexafffund
Génève Awong

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioscience-Scholar · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLymphopoiesisProgenitor cellHaematopoiesisBone marrowProgenitorLineage (genetic)BiologyStem cellCell biologyImmunologyTransplantationT cellCancer researchMedicineImmune systemGeneticsInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T cells are unique in that they begin their development as a progenitor within the bone marrow but complete their differentiation within the thymus. Furthermore, long-term T-lymphopoiesis requires a continuous supply of thymus-bound progenitors derived from the bone marrow. The critical role for T cells is clearly observed in individuals with genetic or acquired immunodeficiencies or those having undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Here, we review the work done by several groups aimed at characterizing the earliest T-lineage progenitors (ETPs), in mouse and human, found within the thymus, in addition to the long-sought after thymus-colonizing progenitor, which makes its journey from the bone marrow via the bloodstream into thymus. The characterization of these progenitors may herald therapeutic insight into the restoration of T cells in immunodeficient individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Bioscience-ScholarSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207