MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2313561641 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.092002

Combined QCD and electroweak analysis of HERA data

2016· article· en· W2313561641 on OpenAlexafffund
H. Abramowicz, I. Abt, L. Adamczyk, M. Adamus, S. Antonelli, V. Aushev, O. Behnke, U. Behrens, A. Bertolin, S. Bhadra, I. Bloch, E. G. Boos, I. Brock, N. H. Brook, R. Brugnera, A. Bruni, P. Bussey, A. Caldwell, M. Capua, C. D. Catterall, J. J. Chwastowski, J. Ciborowski, R. Ciesielski, A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, M. Corradi, R. K. Dementiev, R. C. E. Devenish, S. Dusini, B. Foster, G. P. Gach, E. Gallo, A. Garfagnini, A. Geiser, A. Gizhko, L. K. Gladilin, Yu. A. Golubkov, G. Grzelak, M. P. Guzik, C. Gwenlan, W. Hain, O. Hlushchenko, D. Hochman, R. Hori, Z. A. Ibrahim, Y. Iga, M. Ishitsuka, F. Januschek, N. Z. Jomhari, І. Каденко, S. Kananov, U. Karshon, P. Kaur, D. Kisielewska, R. Klanner, U. Klein, I. A. Korzhavina, A. Kotański, U. Kötz, N. Kovalchuk, H. Kowalski, B. Krupa, Oleg Kuprash, M. Kuze, B. B. Levchenko, A. Levy, S. Limentani, M. Lisovyi, E. Lobodzinska, B. Löhr, E. Lohrmann, A. Longhin, D. Lontkovskyi, O.Yu. Lukina, I. Makarenko, J. Malka, A. Mastroberardino, F. Mohamad Idris, N. Mohammad Nasir, V. Myronenko, K. Nagano, T. Nobe, R.J. Nowak, Y. Onishchuk, E. Paul, W. Perlański, N.S. Pokrovskiy, A. Polini, M. Przybycień, P. Roloff, M. Ruspa, D. H. Saxon, M. Schioppa, U. Schneekloth, T. Schörner-Sadenius, L.M. Shcheglova, R. Shevchenko, O. Shkola, Yu.O. Shyrma, I. Singh, I. O. Skillicorn, W. Słomiński, A. Solano, L. Stanco, N. Stefaniuk, A. Stern, P. Stopa, J. Sztuk-Dambietz, E. ̃Tassi, K. Tokushuku, J. Tomaszewska, T. Tsurugai, M. Turcato, O. Turkot, T. Tymieniecka, A. Verbytskyi, Wan Ahmad Tajuddin Wan Abdullah, Katarzyna Wichmann, M. Wing, S. Yamada, Y. Yamazaki, N. Zakharchuk, A. F. Żarnecki, L. Zawiejski, O. Zenaiev, B.O. Zhautykov, D. S. Zotkin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNarodowe Centrum NaukiNarodowym Centrum NaukiIsrael Science FoundationNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronMinistry of Higher Education, MalaysiaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilStrongMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyHealth Insurance Review and Assessment ServiceDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsElectroweak interactionPhysicsParticle physicsHERAPartonNeutral currentQuantum chromodynamicsNuclear physicsQuarkDeep inelastic scatteringCharged currentVector bosonZEUS (particle detector)TechnicolorBosonScatteringGauge bosonInelastic scatteringGauge theoryQuantum mechanicsNeutrino

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simultaneous fit of parton distribution functions (PDFs) and electroweak parameters to HERA data on deep inelastic scattering is presented. The input data are the neutral current and charged current inclusive cross sections which were previously used in the QCD analysis leading to the HERAPDF2.0 PDFs. In addition, the polarization of the electron beam was taken into account for the ZEUS data recorded between 2004 and 2007. Results on the vector and axial-vector couplings of the $Z$ boson to $u$- and $d$-type quarks, on the value of the electroweak mixing angle and the mass of the $W$ boson are presented. The values obtained for the electroweak parameters are in agreement with Standard Model predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.408 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→