MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313570960 · doi:10.1021/am5071255

Correlation between the Length Reduction of Carbon Nanotubes and the Electrical Percolation Threshold of Melt Compounded Polyolefin Composites

2014· article· en· W2313570960 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexandros A. Vasileiou, Marianna Kontopoulou, Hua Gui, Aristides Docoslis

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials sciencePercolation thresholdPolyolefinCarbon nanotubeComposite materialBreakagePercolation (cognitive psychology)CompoundingNanotubeElectrical resistivity and conductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this work are to quantify the degree of multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) length reduction upon melt compounding and to demonstrate unambiguously that the length reduction is mainly responsible for the increase in electrical percolation threshold of the resulting composites. Polyolefin matrices of varying viscosities and different functional groups are melt compounded with MWCNTs. A simple method is developed to solubilize the polymer matrix and isolate the MWCNTs, enabling detailed imaging analysis. In spite of the perceived strength of the MWCNTs, the results demonstrate that the shear forces developed during melt mixing are sufficient to cause significant nanotube breakage and length reduction. Breakage is promoted when higher MWCNT contents are used, due to increased probability of particle collisions. Furthermore, the higher shear forces transmitted to the nanotubes in the presence of higher matrix viscosities and functional groups that promote interfacial interactions, shift the nanotube distribution toward smaller sizes. The length reduction of the MWCNTs causes significant increases in the percolation threshold, due to the loss of interconnectivity, which results in fewer conductive pathways. These findings are validated by comparing the experimental percolation threshold values with those predicted by the improved interparticle distance theoretical model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207