Cooperativity length scale in nanocomposites: Interfacial and confinement effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interfacial and confinement effects on the evolution of cooperativity on approaching the glass transition have been studied in poly(propylenecoethylene) functionalized with diethylmaleate, polyethylene 1,4-cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate glycol and their nanocomposites with montmorillonite. A small increase of the structural dynamic cooperativity, a weak alteration of the temperature dependence of the characteristic relaxation frequency, and no changes in the glass transition temperature observed in poly(propylenecoethylene)-based samples can be rationalized in terms of interfacial interactions between polymer and exfoliated clay. On the other hand, confinement of polymer chains in the galleries of clay (intercalated nanocomposite) produces a strong reduction of cooperativity, of the temperature dependence of the characteristic relaxation frequency, and of the glass transition temperature in polyethylene 1,4-cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate glycol samples. Finally, by investigating the temperature dependence of a generalized fragility and of cooperativity, we evidenced that fragility of glass formers is determined not only by cooperativity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".