Political Communication in Canada: Meet the Press and Tweet the Rest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part 1: Communication by Canadian Political Institutions 1 The Triangulation of Canadian Political Communication / Tamara A. Small, Thierry Giasson, and Alex Marland 2 The Governing Party and the Permanent Campaign / Anna Esselment 3 Cognitive Effects of Televised Political Advertising in Canada / Penelope Daignault 4 The Branding of a Prime Minister: Digital Information Subsidies and the Image Management of Stephen Harper / Alex Marland 5 Selling Social Democracy: Branding the Political Left in Canada / Jared J. Wesley and Mike Moyes 6 The Not-So Social Network: The Use of Twitter by Canada's Party Leaders / Tamara A. Small Part 2: Canadian Political News Media 7 The Canadian Parliamentary Press Gallery: Still Relevant or Relic of Another Time? / Daniel J. Pare and Susan Delacourt 8 Setting the Agenda? A Case Study of Newspaper Coverage of the 2006 Canadian Election Campaign / Elisabeth Gidengil 9 Playing along New Rules: Personalized Politics in a 24/7 Mediated World / Mireille Lalancette, with Alex Drouin and Catherine Lemarier-Saulnier 10 The Mass Media and Welfare Policy Framing: A Study in Policy Definition / Adam Mahon, Andrea Lawlor, and Stuart Soroka Part 3: Political Communication and Canadian Citizens 11 Opportunities Missed: Non-Profit Public Communication and Advocacy in Canada / Georgina C. Grosenick 12 Blogging, Partisanship, and Political Participation in Canada / Thierry Giasson, Harold Jansen, and Royce Koop 13 We Like This: The Impact of News Websites' Consensus Information on Political Attitudes / J. Scott Matthews and Denver McNeney 14 Political Communication and Marketing in Canada: Challenges for Democracy / Alex Marland, Thierry Giasson, and Tamara A. Small Glossary References Contributors Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".