MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313806352 · doi:10.1071/aseg2009ab140

Results from the first field trial of a borehole gravity meter for mining applications

2009· article· en· W2313806352 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harold O. Seigel, C. Nind, J. MacQueen, Michel Chouteau, Bernard Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeGravimeterGeologyDrillMetreInstrumentation (computer programming)GeodesyGeophysicsRemote sensingMining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scintrex is in the final stages of the development of a borehole gravity meter, for mining and geotechnical applications, designed to log inside NQ drill rods to 2,000 m depth, using standard 4 conductor cable, with a sensitivity of better than 5 µgal, and operable in boreholes inclined from 300 to vertical. École Polytechnique of Montreal has developed forward modelling software, as part of this project. The first field test of the prototype probe was successfully conducted in December 2008 for Vale Inco in a deep borehole located in Norman township near Sudbury, Ontario. The results of this test show a large amplitude bipolar residual gravity anomaly, with the crossover at the location where the borehole intersected sulphides. Further analysis of the data is underway. A repeat log of the hole indicates that the Gravilog system has achieved operational specifications very close to its targets. Field tests for the other sponsors are planned during the first half of 2009, with production surveys to follow during the second half of the year. Gravity measurements inside boreholes provide evidence of density variations both in the immediate vicinity and at a distance from the hole. Scintrex?s development of a new borehole gravimeter will, for the first time, allow the application of gravity logging in typical mining and geotechnical boreholes. Primary applications of the Gravilog system in mining include the sensing and mass-estimates of massive sulphide bodies, either intersected by or remote from the hole; and accurate bulk density measurements of formations intersected by the hole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207