MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313811587 · doi:10.1149/04513.0003ecst

(Invited) Dynamic and Coverage Effects in EIS

2013· article· en· W2313811587 on OpenAlexaff
David A. Harrington

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical impedanceSimple (philosophy)NucleationConstant (computer programming)CollisionAdsorptionThermodynamicsChemistryMechanicsMaterials sciencePhysicsComputer sciencePhysical chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of sweep rate on the validity of impedance measurements made dynamically when sweeping the potential is investigated by numerical solution of the differential equations for a simple adsorption reaction. The same method is used to show that dynamic EIS can detect a nucleation-growth-collision mechanism through a negative time constant, and that measurement in the unstable regime is possible, even though the data is not Kramers-Kronig transformable. The utility of the concept of the rate-determining step in EIS is demonstrated for a simple example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicElectrostatics and Colloid InteractionsFrench-language works237,207