Nationalism and Modernism: Rethinking Scandinavian Design in Canada, 1950–1970
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article considère le rôle du design scandinave dans la recherche d’une identité visuelle canadienne au cours des décennies suivant la Deuxième Guerre mondiale. Nous examinons le discours provenant d’instances gouvernementales et institutionnelles, ainsi que des revues professionnelles d’art et d’architecture : le « moderne scandinave » s’est ainsi vu recontextualisé et approprié par des institutions qui cherchaient à améliorer tant le goût du public que les industries du design au Canada, et est devenu un modèle pour un design canadien potentiellement « authentique ». Nous examinons le mobilier conçu par Sigrin Bülow-Hübe, née en Suède et installée au Canada, et le comparons à l’appropriation de styles scandinaves par des concepteurs nés au Canada, afin d’explorer les effets de ces emprunts sur le design canadien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".