MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313915067 · doi:10.1109/tcc.2016.2535223

Selective Mobile Cloud Offloading to Augment Multi-Persona Performance and Viability

2016· article· en· W2313915067 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hanine Tout, Chamseddine Talhi, Nadjia Kara, Azzam Mourad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConseil National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsComputer sciencePersonaCloud computingVirtualizationScalabilityOverhead (engineering)Context (archaeology)Mobile deviceMobile computingOperating systemEmbedded systemDistributed computingHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fueled by changes in professional application models, personal interests and desires and technological advances in mobile devices, multi-persona has emerged recently to keep balance between different aspects, in our daily life, on a single mobile terminal. In this context, mobile virtualization technology has turned the corner and currently heading towards widespread adoption to realize multi-persona. Although recent lightweight virtualization techniques were able to maintain balance between security and scalability of personas, the limited CPU power and insufficient memory and battery capacities, still threaten personas performance and viability. Throughout the last few years, cloud computing has cultivated and refined the concept of outsourcing computing resources, and nowadays, in the coming age of smartphones and tablets, the prerequisites are met for importing cloud computing to support resource constrained mobiles. From these premises, we propose in this paper a novel offloading-based approach that based on global resource usage monitoring, generic and adaptable problem formulation and heuristic decision making, is capable of augmenting personas performance and viability on mobile terminals. The experiments show its capability of reducing the resource usage overhead and energy consumption of the applications running in each persona, accelerating their execution and improving their scalability, allowing better adoption of multi-persona solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cloud ComputingSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207