Selective Mobile Cloud Offloading to Augment Multi-Persona Performance and Viability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fueled by changes in professional application models, personal interests and desires and technological advances in mobile devices, multi-persona has emerged recently to keep balance between different aspects, in our daily life, on a single mobile terminal. In this context, mobile virtualization technology has turned the corner and currently heading towards widespread adoption to realize multi-persona. Although recent lightweight virtualization techniques were able to maintain balance between security and scalability of personas, the limited CPU power and insufficient memory and battery capacities, still threaten personas performance and viability. Throughout the last few years, cloud computing has cultivated and refined the concept of outsourcing computing resources, and nowadays, in the coming age of smartphones and tablets, the prerequisites are met for importing cloud computing to support resource constrained mobiles. From these premises, we propose in this paper a novel offloading-based approach that based on global resource usage monitoring, generic and adaptable problem formulation and heuristic decision making, is capable of augmenting personas performance and viability on mobile terminals. The experiments show its capability of reducing the resource usage overhead and energy consumption of the applications running in each persona, accelerating their execution and improving their scalability, allowing better adoption of multi-persona solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it