Mixed convection flow of an electrically conducting fluid in a vertical channel with boundary conditions of the third kind
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the effects of viscous and Ohmic dissipation in steady, laminar, mixed, convection heat transfer for an electrically conducting fluid flowing through a vertical channel is investigated in both aiding and opposing buoyancy situations. The plates exchange heat with an external fluid. Both conditions of equal and different reference temperatures of the external fluid are considered. First, the simpler cases of either negligible Brinkman number or negligible Grashof number are addressed with the help of analytical solutions. The combined effects of buoyancy forces and viscous dissipation are analyzed using a perturbation series method valid for small values of the perturbation parameter. To relax the conditions on the perturbation parameter, the governing equations are also evaluated numerically by a shooting technique that uses the classical explicit Runge–Kutta method of four slopes as an integration scheme and the Newton–Raphson method as a correction scheme. In the examined cases of velocity and temperature fields, the Nusselt numbers at both the walls and the average velocity are explored. It is found that the velocity profiles for an open circuit (E > 0 or E < 0) lie in between the short circuit (E = 0). The graphical results illustrating the effects of various parameters on the flow as well as the average velocity and Nusselt numbers are presented for open and short circuits. In the absence of electric field load parameter and Hartmann number, the results agree with Zanchini (Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 41, 3949 (1998)). Further, the analytical and numerical solutions agree very well for small values of the perturbation parameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".