MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313977485 · doi:10.1149/1.3204392

Detection of Vacancy Distributions by Decoration with Hydrogen

2009· article· en· W2313977485 on OpenAlexaff
R. Job, F.‐J. Niedernostheide, Hans‐Joachim Schulze, Holger Schulze

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVacancy defectAcceptorPlatinumHydrogenMaterials scienceDopingDiffusionIonSiliconChemical physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Molecular physicsAtomic physicsChemistryCrystallographyOptoelectronicsCondensed matter physicsThermodynamicsCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A well-known method for the determination of vacancy distributions in silicon is based on the decoration of vacancies with in-diffused platinum and subsequent profiling of the Pt-distribution with DLTS analysis. The vacancy profile can then be correlated with the substitutional Pt profile. However, there are significant drawbacks of this method: The in-diffusion of platinum is a high-temperature step, which already can alter the vacancy profile; moreover, DLTS measurements with a suitable depth resolution are time-consuming and difficult. Therefore, it is proposed in this paper to decorate the vacancies with hydrogen by processes finally resulting in the formation of vacancy- and hydrogen-related donor and acceptor states. The determination of such doping profiles and by this the detection of vacancy distributions can be easily enabled by depth-resolved spreading resistance measurements with a very good spatial resolution. Hydrogen atoms for the decoration of vacancies can be incorporated by plasma exposure or ion implantation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207