MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314018711

Wireless future: green and cooperative networking?

2009· article· en· W2314018711 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViewpointsWirelessComputer scienceWireless networkEuropean commissionComputer networkTelecommunicationsBusinessEuropean union
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cooperative principle is expected to be effective in having wireless users more satisfyingly achiev their communication goals. Different layers are anticipated to benefit from its strength, from the low physical and network lev els, up to the service level, where novel, exciting applications such as IP-TV are rousing. This trend is paralleled by an increased consciousness that wireless devices(from end-user handsets to wireless routers) have to be designed paying a specific attention to environmental efficiency: again, this translates into smart power management solutiions at RF level, but also in skillful algorithm design, carefully tailored communication protocols, lightweight and distributed databases. The incited experts will provide the audience with sharp, brief presentations reflecting their ideas on such topics, and will interact answering the questions raised by the floor. A specific attention will be devoted to the industy and European Commission viewpoints on the subjects the panel is centered upon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it