MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314019165 · doi:10.1130/g31121.1

Gravity-driven flow in a submarine channel bend: Direct field evidence of helical flow reversal

2010· article· en· W2314019165 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel R. Parsons, Jeff Peakall, A.E. Aksu, Roger D. Flood, Richard N. Hiscott, Şükrü Beşiktepe, Darrell Mouland

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsHistoryLibrary scienceArt historyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Submarine meandering channels are conduits that transport gravity-driven flows and sediments into the deep sea. Such channel systems form distributive networks across submarine fans, ultimately forming the largest sedimentary deposits on Earth. Despite this, our understanding of flow processes and the sedimentary evolution of sinuous submarine channel systems remains poor, primarily due to a lack of, thus far elusive, direct field observation and measurements of flows within submarine channel bends. In the absence of direct field measurements, our understanding of these systems has necessarily been speculative, relying until very recently on bend flow theory derived from research in subaerial river channel bends. Although recent measurements and results from scaled laboratory experiments and numerical modeling of submarine channel bends have advanced our understanding of some of the relations between flows, forms, and the implications for sedimentary deposits, key results from this recent research have been contradictory. Notably, several studies have indicated that the helical flow structures within submarine bend flows closely match those found ubiquitously in subaerial river channels, while conflicting research has reported a reversal of this helical flow structure, with associated far-reaching implications for deep-sea sedimentology. This paper presents the first direct three-dimensional measurements of the flow field in a natural submarine channel bend. The results, from a submarine channel bend on the Black Sea shelf, demonstrate for the first time that a reversed helical flow structure can occur in seafloor channel bends. Such findings have major implications for process sedimentology in these environments, because the direction and strength of helical flow fields are known to impart a significant influence on cross-stream sediment sorting in bends and thus the stratigraphy of the deposits produced by these channel systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207