MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314032529 · doi:10.1061/40885(215)12

Deformation of Round Determinate Panels Containing Fibres

2006· article· en· W2314032529 on OpenAlexaff
Hanfeng Xu, Qian Gu, Sidney Mindess

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrackingMaterials scienceStructural engineeringDeformation (meteorology)ResidualComposite materialReinforced concreteTest dataResidual strengthTest methodComputer scienceEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study describes an investigation of the post-cracking performance of fibre-reinforced-concrete round determinate panels under large deflections, i.e., after the panels are severely cracked. By measuring the rotation and sliding of the panel segments, an innovative test setup was incorporated into a modified version of ASTM C1550 to measure crack widths. Four types of fibres (one deformed steel fibre and three different synthetic fibres) were incorporated into different concrete matrices to validate the proposed test method. It was found that the test method provides reasonable accuracy for crack width measurement, and that the residual load vs. crack width opening can provide a good indication of the crack resistance of the fibres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207