MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314094050 · doi:10.1149/05011.0071ecst

An Arrhenius Argument to Explain Electrical Conductivity Maxima versus Temperature

2013· article· en· W2314094050 on OpenAlexaff
Colin M. Kuntz, Allan L. L. East

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicIonic liquids properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArrhenius equationMaximaCounterionConductivityIonThermodynamicsChemistryIon-associationBismuthChlorideElectrical resistivity and conductivityChemical physicsActivation energyPhysical chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The existence of conductivity maxima in pure molten salt was interpreted by Grantham and Yosim to be due to ion association at low densities. Tödheide used a chloride-transfer shifting-equilibrium hypothesis to explain ion association in the case of bismuth trichloride. We have performed density-functional-theory based molecular dynamics simulations of the molten chlorides of Bi(III), Sn(II), and Hg(II), and Tödheide's hypothesis is not supported. Instead, the simulations imply a hopping barrier for ions between counterions, and we develop this concept into a density-dependent Arrhenius equation to explain the conductivity maxima.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicIonic liquids properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207