MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314116692 · doi:10.4161/chan.5.2.14313

Common allosteric mechanisms between ryanodine and inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors

2011· article· en· W2314116692 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhiguang Yuchi, Filip Van Petegem

Bibliographic record

VenueChannels · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRyanodine receptorAllosteric regulationRYR1Endoplasmic reticulumInositolInositol trisphosphate receptorChemistryReceptorBiophysicsCalcium signalingCell biologyBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ryanodine receptors (RyRs) are calcium release channels found in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We recently described the crystal structure of the RyR1 N-terminal disease hot spot. It is built up by three domains that show clear structural homology with the inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) binding core and suppressor domain of IP3 receptors (IP3Rs) . Here we analyze the structural features of the domains in both calcium release channels, and propose a model for the closed state of the IP3R N-terminal region. This model explains the effect of the suppressor domain on the affinity for IP3 and is supported by mutational studies performed previously. We propose a mechanism whereby opening of both RyR and IP3R is allosterically coupled to a displacement of the N-terminal domain from the following two domains. This displacement can be affected by disease mutations, glutathionylation of a highly reactive cysteine residue, or ligand binding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChannelsSame topicCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolismFrench-language works237,207