MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314122844 · doi:10.1061/9780784412848.232

Stability of X-Bracing Systems with Traditional Bolted Connections

2013· article· en· W2314122844 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2013 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBracingBraceStructural engineeringBucklingShear (geology)BendingEngineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the design for stability of steel concentrically X-bracing frames built with HSS bracing members. Traditional slotted-tube connections with bolted shear splices are used for the bracing members. Both single- and double-shear splices are investigated. Full-scale quasi-static cyclic test program showed that instability of the discontinuous braces initiated through bending deformations of the connection plates, prior to overall buckling of the bracing members. Elastic stability analysis is performed to assess the effective buckling length and compressive resistances of the bracing members with double shear connections. Brace resistances are also obtained from an analytical model that accounts for inelasticity effects and geometrical imperfections of the brace connections. Numerical predictions are compared to test results and a numerical example is included to illustrate the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it