Incessant atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy, biventricular thrombosis, and pulmonary emboli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tabled 1KEY TEACHING POINTS•Although atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia is generally considered a benign arrhythmia in otherwise healthy individuals, nonspecific symptoms may lead to late presentation with untoward consequences.•Long-standing incessant atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia can provoke tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy, characterized by potentially reversible ventricular dilation and dysfunction.•This case report extends the spectrum of potential major complications associated with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia to include severe biventricular dysfunction, biventricular thrombosis, and pulmonary emboli with pulmonary infarction. Open table in a new tab
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".