MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314184613 · doi:10.1149/05012.0249ecst

Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering on Ordered Metal Nanodot Array Obtained Using Anodic Porous Alumina

2013· article· en· W2314184613 on OpenAlexaff
Toshiaki Kondo, Kazuyuki Nishio, Hideki Masuda

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsNanodotMaterials scienceRaman scatteringNanostructureSubstrate (aquarium)Raman spectroscopyPorosityFinite-difference time-domain methodNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fabrication of an ordered array of Au nanodots using anodic porous alumina as an evaporation mask, and its application to a substrate for the measurement of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) were studied. One of the advantageous points of using anodic porous alumina as a template to fabricate nanostructures is that the size, shape and arrangement of the obtained nanostructures can be controlled by changing the geometrical structures of the porous alumina. Au nanodot arrays were obtained by thermal evaporation method. The SERS signals of pyridine molecules adsorbed on the nanodots were detected. The intensity of the SERS signals was strongly dependent on the arrangement of the nanodots. The enhancement factor of the intensity of the incident light on Au nanodots was analyzed by numerical calculations based on finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. The obtained SERS substrates are expected to be used for Raman spectra measurement with high sensitivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207