MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314218311 · doi:10.2514/6.2011-6056

Segmented SRM Pressure Oscillation Demonstrator

2011· article· en· W2314218311 on OpenAlex
Giorgio Mastrangelo, Julien Klochendler, Dario Scoccimarro, Fabio Paglia, Marco Telara, Philippe Cloutet, Cecile Collado, Severine Larrieu, Franck Godfroy, Didier Boury, Eric Gautronneau, Arnaud Vogt, Philippe Planquart

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRocket and propulsion systems research
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrustOscillation (cell signaling)AcousticsVortexAerospace engineeringPhysicsSolid-fuel rocketPayload (computing)Rocket (weapon)EngineeringMechanicsComputer sciencePropellant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large rocket motors, especially those with segmented grains, often exhibit pressure and thrust oscillations caused by coupling between large scale vortices (vortex shedding) and the acoustic modes of the chamber. The pressure oscillation of most concern in large motors is the longitudinal modes roughly corresponding to the first acoustic modes of the motor. The resultant thrust oscillations are a small percentage of the overall thrust level, but this excitation source can have major impact on the designs of the motor components, flight vehicle structure, avionics, and payload.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRocket and propulsion systems researchFrench-language works237,207