MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314234075 · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000000679

Sixteen years of the Roche Organ Transplantation Research Foundation

2015· letter· en· W2314234075 on OpenAlexaffabout
Philip F. Halloran

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersRoche Organ Transplant Research Foundation
KeywordsTransplantationFoundation (evidence)CharterOrgan transplantationPolitical scienceMedicineLawSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organ transplantation was one of the key medical successes of the 20th century, transforming irreversible organ failure from a death sentence to a potentially solvable problem. Nevertheless, at the end of the last century, a number of problems still limited the potential of transplantation. With this in mind, the Roche Organ Transplantation Research Foundation (ROTRF) was established in 1998, with a mission to advance the science of organ transplantation to further improve transplant results. The Foundation was set up by F. Hoffmann-La Roche (Roche) as an independent medical research charity that provides operating grants to academic staff for innovative and important research projects. The Foundation is legally independent from Roche and is guided solely by the ROTRF Board of Trustees according to its charter. The initial funding of 25 million Swiss Francs (CHF) over 5 years was subsequently increased to a total of 67.5 million CHF (U.S. $70.6 million). The ROTRF is proud to announce that it completed its mission and in May 2014, the Foundation completed its 29th and final funding cycle. Funding was awarded to 7 projects for innovative research proposals, bringing the total number of projects funded by the ROTRF to 289 projects in 103 centers in 17 countries around the world. Although researchers at all stages of their careers have received funding, the ROTRF has always made it a priority to support the careers of young, promising investigators. The results from ROTRF-funded projects not only created novel areas of research and remarkable insights but also helped to establish the careers of many of the emerging leaders in numerous fields of organ transplantation. In order to distribute the funds to the most deserving applicants, a novel online two-step application process was developed. In the first step, a short letter of intent was submitted, which was reviewed by at least 3 members of the Scientific Advisory Committee based on scientific excellence, relevance, and originality. The top-ranked applicants were then invited to submit a full application. Since 2008, the ROTRF has exclusively funded clinically oriented research projects to encourage research that is likely to have a near-term impact on the clinical management of patients. In 2006, a 3-year initiative was launched with the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International to support projects in immunology and biology research relevant to pancreatic islet transplantation, and transplantation solutions for human type 1 diabetes. During this initiative, a total of 2.5 million Swiss francs was distributed to 10 research projects. Over the years, ROTRF grantees have made significant contributions to our understanding in the field of transplantation. The results of the excellent scientific and clinical research have not only been published on the ROTRF website (www.rotrf.org) and in the ROTRF Annual Reports but also at scientific symposia at international transplantation congresses and in prestigious international scientific journals, highlighting how the results of ROTRF-supported projects have contributed to our understanding of organ transplantation. Furthermore, in 2011, the Foundation awarded ROTRF Recognition Prizes to those investigators whose ROTRF-funded research findings have had a major impact on the field and exemplified the mission of the ROTRF. Over the coming months, the ROTRF will distribute its final grants and the Foundation will complete its mandate. The Trustees, on behalf of the transplant community and the patients whom they serve, want to extend their deepest gratitude to F. Hoffmann-La Roche for the outstanding gift that they provided in the form of the ROTRF. The Trustees also want to acknowledge the many individuals who served on the Scientific Advisory Committee and as ad hoc reviewers. Their thoughtful and insightful reviews supported the Trustees in making their final decisions. The ROTRF Secretariat has guided and supported us through the complex financial and legal requirements of providing an international peer-reviewed granting system, and the Trustees would like to thank NSPM Ltd for administrative support, in particular Niki Schmidt and Claudia Ellenrieder. Finally, the Trustees would like to thank the grantees, whose hard work and commitment to bettering the lives of transplant patients ultimately realized the mission of the ROTRF, and for this we wish to express our most sincere gratitude. As the ROTRF completes its mission, the legacy it leaves behind will carry on across the world’s transplant centers as we continue to improve the lives of the hundreds of thousands of people whose lives are being changed by organ transplantation. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Board of Trustees (terms of office in brackets): Philip Halloran, Chairman, Canada (1998–); Andrew Bradley, UK (2004–); Dominique Borie, USA (2007–2008, 2014–); Robert Booth, USA (1998–2002); Robert Colvin, USA (2007–); Pekka Häyry, Finland (1998–2002); Allan Kirk, USA (2004–); Maarten Kraan, USA (2009–2010); Leslie Miller, USA (1998–2000); Peter J. Morris, UK (1998–2003); Gerhard Opelz, Germany (2003–); Laurence Peterson, USA (2010–2012); Anthony Quinn (2005–2006); Giuseppe Remuzzi, Italy (2008–); Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo, Spain (2010–); Hans W. Sollinger, USA (1998–2003); Jean-Paul Soulillou, France (2002–2007); Megan Sykes, USA (2001–2006); George Vratsanos, USA (2010); Peter Wijngaard, Switzerland (2004–2007); Hans Wizgell, Sweden (1998–2003); James Woody, USA (2002–2003). Scientific Advisory Committee (terms of office vary): Maria-Luisa Alegre, USA; Anthony d’Apice, Australia; Jeffrey Bluestone, USA; Andrew Bradley, UK; Sophie Brouard, France; Jeremy Chapman, Australia; Pierre-Alain Clavien, Switzerland; Robert Colvin, USA; Henrik Ekberg, Sweden; Sandy Feng, USA; Christiane Ferran, USA; Jay Fishman, USA; Xavier Forns, Spain; Michel Goldman, Belgium; Gregg Hadley, USA; Claus Hammer, Germany; Bruce Kaplan, USA; John Kirby, UK; Fadi Lakkis, USA; Robert Lechler, UK ; Leendert Paul, The Netherlands; Philip O’Connell, Australia; John O’Grady, UK; Tom Pearson, USA; Richard Pierson III, USA; Jeffrey Platt, USA; Heinz Regele, Austria; Giuseppe Remuzzi, Italy; Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo, Spain; Stephen Schwartz, USA; Angus Thomson, USA; Yves Vanrenterghem, Belgium; Larry Turka, USA; Hans-Dieter Volk, Germany; Mark Waer, Belgium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207