Source Determination for Subsurface Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (LNAPL) Using Trimethylcyclopentane and Trimethylcyclohexane Isomer Ratios
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ratios of two pairs of cyclic hydrocarbon isomers are developed to link petroleum hydrocarbon pools and residuals in the subsurface to their probable source product. The ratios 1,2,4- trimethylcyclopentane/1,2,3- trimethylcyclopentane, and 1,1,3- trimethylcyclohexane/1,2,4- trimethylcyclohexane are proposed for LNAPL-source correlation because the pairs are present in a wide range of refinery feeds and refined products, they are resistant to aerobic biodegradation, and have similar solubility and volatility. The proposed ratios and other conventional methods are used to evaluate the source of hydrocarbon product encountered in wells at the Shiraz Oil Refinery, Iran. Keywords: light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL)source determinationdiagnostic ratiostrimethylcyclohexanetrimethylcyclopentane Acknowledgment The Shiraz Oil Refining Company supported this research (Project No. 86/84/48) and we are grateful for their collaboration during the fieldwork. Many thanks to Dr. Thomas Wendel, Renate Seelig and Julia Saturn from the Hydrogeochemistry Lab of Tuebingen University for GC/MS analysis and their technical assistance. Suggestions by two anonymous reviewers were most helpful in developing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it