MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314259142 · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2013.6855702

A red-based discard strategy for unacknowledged mode RLC in LTE

2013· article· en· W2314259142 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Zheng, Qi‐Yue Yu, Weixiao Meng, Cheng Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Science and Technology Major ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRLC circuitTelecommunications linkComputer scienceHandoverComputer networkWirelessPhysical layerScheme (mathematics)TelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to satisfy the increasing demands of wireless mobile communications, Long Term Evolution (LTE) has been proposed as an all-IP-based network to bring higher peak data rates and better spectral efficiency. As one of the sub-layers of LTE, Radio Link Control (RLC) layer is likely to congest or overflow due to handover or undesirable channel condition. In this paper, based on Random Early Detection (RED), a discard strategy is proposed for Unacknowledged Mode (UM) RLC to overcome the congestion and buffer overflow problems. Taking LTE systems into account, a simpler improved RED discard strategy is proposed, which is suitable to the delay-sensitive stream that transmitted by a UM RLC entity. This discard strategy can be employed in UE for uplink or evolved NodeBs (eNB) for downlink. The delay and discard performances of the proposed discard strategy are evaluated by both computer simulations and theoretical analysis. According to the simulation results, some suggestions about configuring parameters of the proposed discard strategy are given. In the end, to systematize the strategy and make it more practical, a cross-layer specific proposal is proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207